Comparison of Bridging Systems
January 25, 2026**Negative Moment Reinforcement (ODKA Bars) in Open Web Steel Joists:
Why NIAZIT Joists Do Not Require Top Reinforcement**
SEO Title
Negative Moment Reinforcement in Open Web Steel Joists | ODKA Bars vs NIAZIT System
Meta Description
Technical comparison of negative moment behavior in chromite open web steel joists and NIAZIT joists based on SJI principles. Why ODKA bars are required in chromite systems but not in NIAZIT.
1. Introduction
In steel joist floor systems, negative bending moments at supports play a critical role in the structural design of joists.
In conventional chromite open web steel joists, these moments are typically resisted using top reinforcement bars (ODKA bars).
However, in NIAZIT joist systems, which are steel joists without concrete in the web, such reinforcement is not required.
This article explains this difference based on structural mechanics, section properties, and SJI design philosophy.
2. Negative Moment Behavior in Steel Joists
According to SJI design principles:
Positive bending governs mid-span behavior
Negative bending governs support regions
In negative moment zones:
Top chord → tension
Bottom chord → compression
Since concrete has negligible tensile capacity, the steel section alone must resist negative moment tension forces.
3. Chromite Joists and the Necessity of ODKA Bars
3.1 Structural Configuration
Chromite joists typically consist of:
Top chord: steel angle (L-section)
Bottom chord: steel bar or plate
Web: steel lattice, filled with concrete after installation
ODKA bars: additional top reinforcement at supports
3.2 Structural Limitations of the Top Angle
From a section mechanics perspective:
Angle sections have:
Low radius of gyration
Asymmetrical stress distribution
Reduced tensile efficiency under negative bending
As a result, the top angle alone cannot reliably resist support tension forces.
3.3 Concrete Dependency and Cracking
Although the web is filled with concrete:
Concrete cracks under tensile stress at supports
Once cracked, it cannot participate in negative moment resistance
The load path shifts entirely to steel elements
This creates a structural gap, which is compensated by ODKA bars.
3.4 Function of ODKA Bars
ODKA bars:
Are placed near the top chord at supports
Provide tensile capacity for negative bending
Control cracking and rotation at supports
In chromite systems, ODKA bars are structurally mandatory, not optional.
4. NIAZIT Joists: Why ODKA Bars Are Not Required
4.1 Correct Definition of NIAZIT System
NIAZIT joists:
Are not classified as precast joists under Iranian regulations
Have no concrete in the web
Rely entirely on steel section behavior and geometry
4.2 Tee Section as Top Chord
The most significant difference is the top chord section.
NIAZIT uses a steel Tee section
Compared to angles, Tee sections offer:
Higher radius of gyration
Symmetrical stress distribution
Improved tensile stability
A higher radius of gyration directly improves resistance to tensile deformation under negative moments.
4.3 Negative Moment Distribution
In NIAZIT joists:
Load transfer is entirely steel-based
No reliance on cracked concrete
Negative moment stresses are:
Distributed across the entire Tee section
Not concentrated at a single reinforcement bar
This eliminates the need for localized top reinforcement.
5. Comparison Summary
| Feature | Chromite Joist | NIAZIT Joist |
|---|---|---|
| Top chord section | Angle | Tee |
| Radius of gyration | Low | High |
| Web concrete | Yes | No |
| Negative moment resistance | ODKA bars | Section geometry |
| Dependence on concrete | High | None |
6. Conclusion
Chromite joists require ODKA bars due to:
Limited tensile capacity of angle sections
Concrete cracking at negative moment zones
Low radius of gyration
NIAZIT joists:
Use Tee top chords with superior section properties
Rely on steel-only load paths
Satisfy negative moment requirements without additional reinforcement
This distinction reflects engineering optimization, not material reduction.

